2007 Revised STR LOGO

12/17/07 Newsletter

Citizen Journalism Focused on Liberty, Conservatism and Independent Thought

 

Newsletter: State Rep. Frank Corte Faces Democrat Activist in 2008
Exclusive Report by Joe Solis/South Texas Republicans
 

 Corte picture

State Representative Frank Corte & Valerie Corte

The Majella Foundation Dinner, 12/13/07

Picture Courtesy of Steve Walker/Walker Report

 

 Carnot

Frances Carnot

Picture Courtesy of Steve Walker/Walker Report

Linebarger, Groggan, Blair, & Sampson Christmas Party, 12/14/2007

 

Republican State Representative Frank Corte is being challenged by Frances Carnot, President of the Bexar County Democratic Women, for the position of District 122 State Representative in November 2008.  Mrs. Frances Carnot filed December 14th for the position.  Our source tells us the following about Frances: 

"Frances has strong ties to the San Antonio Police Department since her husband is a retired S.A.P.D. officer with lots of connections. She is known for her political street savvy but in a district known for its heavily conservative leanings it is doubtful she will be able to penetrate Frank's core constituents."

"Look to see an odd assortment of Democratic organizations rally behind the diminutive woman ready to fight an uphill battle against the long-term state representative."
 

I'll close this short report with the following letter: 

Frank Corte, Jr. is the Chairman of the Texas House Republican Caucus

The following letter was sent out by Representative Corte on 10/5/2007 

Dear Friend,

Recently, the Chairman of the Texas Democrat Caucus leveled personal accusations against Republican members and the Speaker questioning our right to speak, assemble and participate in our democratic institutions. In the make-believe world of Rep. Dunnam, we have no right to stand up for our rights, engage in the election process or work to increase our Republican numbers in the legislature.

While Mr. Dunnam lectures us, he engages in the politics of division and cynicism. When he didn't get his way on redistricting, he ran away to Oklahoma. Instead of moving Texas forward, he sets up roadblocks to delay good legislation that will help Texas families and businesses. Hi! s allies are the same special interests the voters threw out of office when they elected a Republican majority.

The Texas Democrat Party long ago sold out to liberal special interest, personal injury trial lawyers, big labor and those who want bigger, more intrusive government. Texas Democrats want more of your paycheck in higher taxes. They favor more red-tape regulation to strangle business and choke off economic growth. They want government run health care instead of market-driven health care that allows citizens the right to choose their own doctor. They oppose reforms that would improve our schools or eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in government. They even oppose common sense voter ID so we have free and fair elections.

In the battle of ideas, our ideas triumph. Republicans run every statewide office in Texas and we are in majorities in the House and Senate. We are also in the majority in our Congressional delegation. In short, Republicans win elections when we stand up for what we believe and Texas moves forward when bad ideas go down to defeat. 

We have always worked with members across the aisle and will continue to do so. Perhaps if Mr. Dunnam would cool his partisan rhetoric and attack-style politics, we could do even more.

I encourage the Democrat House Caucus Chairman to work with me and all members for a Texas that puts people before partisan politics.

Sincerely,

Frank Corte, Jr.

Chairman

Texas House Republican Caucus

Senate Passes Defense Authorization Package After Months of Partisan Hold-Up.  Update from U.S. Sen. John Cornyn

Includes Cornyn-Backed Measures to Boost Wounded Warrior Care at BAMC

Friday, December 14, 2007

WASHINGTON-U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, today announced final passage of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, which authorizes critical funding for U.S. troops serving overseas, improvements to military health care, and national security operations under the Departments of Defense (DOD) and Energy.

"Support for our men and women in uniform and their families should never be politicized the way it has been in recent months. Our troops make every sacrifice on behalf of our security and well-being; the very least we can do is a send a unified message of support from the Congress with no political strings attached. I'm thankful partisans in the Senate finally put politics aside and approved this important authorization bill to ensure our military personnel are receiving the best in care, equipment, and benefits. Most importantly, this bill authorizes record funding for military health care-a top priority for the brave men and women returning from Iraq and Afghanistan."
 

The bill includes important provisions that directly assist facilities like Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) in helping our men and women in uniform make a smooth and seamless transition from military medical care to VA care and civilian life. These provisions stem from the Dignified Treatment of Wounded Warriors Act, legislation Sen. Cornyn cosponsored to help relieve some of the difficulties that wounded service members and their families face as they go through recovery and rehabilitation, and assist them in planning for their future.

"Having seen firsthand the quality of work being done at BrookeArmyMedicalCenter, I can attest to the hospital's reputation as a national leader in military care. The tailored care the center provides to our wounded warriors is second to none, and essential in helping these brave men and women transition to civilian life. The defense authorization package approved today will directly assist BrookeArmyMedicalCenter in continuing its mission to provide state-of-the-art services and rehabilitative care to our servicemen and women."

Details on provisions to assist wounded warriors: 

· Requires DOD and the Department of Veterans Affairs to jointly develop policies on care, management, and transition of recovering troops in outpatient status

· Expands treatment and research for some of the signature injuries of the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan, traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder

Authorizations for Texas-specific defense programs:
 

· Authorizes funding for several programs that are critical for our national defense, such as the Joint Strike Fighter, F-22 Raptor and the V-22 Osprey aircraft.

Other Key Provisions in the Defense Authorization Act
 

· Provides a 3.5 percent across-the-board pay raise for all uniformed personnel, a half a percent more than the President's request;

· Authorizes $135 billion for military personnel, including costs of pay, allowances, bonuses, death benefits, and permanent change of station moves;

· Adds $4 billion to the President's budget for mine resistant vehicles to protect our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan;

· Authorizes $24.6 billion in funding for our military healthcare systems.


 


 

Alamo City Republican Women Host Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst in San Antonio

Loretta Cormier will be singing Christmas carols starting at 10:30AM accompanied by Barry Brake on the piano. Loads of free door prizes.  
 

Invite a friend to this special event.

Date: Tuesday, December 18, 2007        11:00 Am

Location:    Oak Hills Country Club

RESERVATIONS ARE REQUIRED

 RSVP Contact: Barbara (210) 342-5482 OR Carolyn 493-6210 or Email to: ACRW.Reservations@gmail.com with your name, how many guests attending and a phone number.

Cost: $20 With  Reservations made by Noon on Friday December 14,2007.

$25 AT THE DOOR on December 18.

Make all checks payable to: ACRW/PAC.

Terri Hall is the 2007 San Antonian of the Year.

1200 WOAI is the information source.
 

Terri Hall SA of Year
 

HOW A HOME SCHOOLING MOM FROM CALIFORNIA TAUGHT
TEXANS A LESSON IN DEMOCRACY

by Jim Forsyth/1200 WOAI

It was not long after Terri Hall moved with her growing family from northern California to Spring Branch that she learned that badly needed expansions to US 281, which was to be the lifeline between her family's new home and the restaurants, shops, and entertainment of San Antonio, would involve toll lanes.  With a  lifelong interest in public policy and a desire to get involved in her new community, Hall, an English major at UCLA, attended a couple of public meetings held by transportation planners and noticed something disturbing.

"We were talking," Hall recalls.  "But they weren't listening."

Three years after those fateful meetings, if toll road planners from Regional Mobility Authority Chairman Dr. Bill Thornton to Texas Department of Transportation Chairman Ric Williamson could get one do-over in life, it would undoubtedly be to pay more attention to the woman in row seven.  Because while construction of new toll roads in Houston, Dallas, Ft. Worth, even in usually contentious Austin, have been little more than photo-ops where men in suits can smile while holding golden shovels, in San Antonio it has turned into the first truly citizen driven open discussion about the proper role of government and the future for quality of life issues in this region since the Applewhite Reservoir debates of the mid 1990's.  And for forming, molding, and leading the most effective grass roots organization since Ernie Cortez was exchanging pennies at Frost Bank in 1975, Terri Hall is the 2007 San Antonian of the Year.

Complete article: Click here

 ________________________________________________________

Reader Responds to Recent MPO Vote and Toll Road Issue

Joe - a no vote on the toll situation will also require a tax increase. Yesterday's paper touted the great influx of hotels and resorts that we are currently experiencing. I shuddered when I read we are getting several out near us (I10/l604). That means a whole new deluge of traffic when our roads can't even adequately take care of what traffic there is now. This city will double in a few years. Look how long it has taken and is taking to increase the roads now in every direction, yet before they are completed, there aren't enough. What used to take 20-25 mins travel time now takes closer to an hour and if any accident, minor or otherwise, over an hour. We have gotten to the point we go to very few events in the downtown area which begin from 4:30-6:30 p.m. And when we get through, if ever, talking about the roads, what about the water? Where is all the water going to come from in a several year drought, to take care of the needs of the citizens, let alone all those toilets and showers in the big resorts/hotels/restaurants. Are we crazy or what? Taxes will have to be raised to build new roads and get some kind of water from somewhere.
 

Congressman Lamar Smith, Twenty First Congressional District of Texas 

Visiting Washington, DC 

Washington is full of stately monuments and exciting history and I am pleased to provide you with information about the area. Some specific tours can be arranged through my office, while other locations can be toured at your discretion.

For specific tour, public transportation, and accommodation Information please look over the Visiting Washington, DC webpage.  
 

Please indicate the quantity of each ticket type you would like me to request for you. 

 White House Tours 

 CapitolBuilding Tours  

 Congressional Gallery Passes  

 Bureau of Engraving Passes (no more than 10 tickets per request) 

 Supreme Court Passes (no more than 6 people per request) 

 Department of the Interior Tours 

 Library of Congress Passes

 
Click here for more information:


 

Farewell Radio and Television Address to the American People by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, January 17, 1961.

My fellow Americans:

Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.

This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.
 

Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.

Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.

My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.

In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward. So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.
 

II

We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocausts America is today the strongest, the most influential and most productive nation in the world. Understandably proud of this pre-eminence, we yet realize that America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.

III

Throughout America's adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.
 

Progress toward these noble goals is persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beings. We face a hostile ideology-global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle-with liberty at stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small,there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research-these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.

But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs-balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage-balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between action of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.

IV

A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.
 

Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peace time, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.
 

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
 

In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
 

Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.

The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system-ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.

V

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we-you and I, and our government-must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.
 

VI

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.
 

Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose difference, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war-as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years-I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.

Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.

VII

So-in this my last good night to you as your President-I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find something's worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.

You and I-my fellow citizens-need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation's great goals.

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration.
 

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.
 

Speech Source:

"The Republicrat PLUS" (A Moderate Viewpoint)

This is a series by 3 anonymous political insiders in Bexar County and one in Webb County. The views of this section do not represent the views of South Texas Republicans PAC.
 

Word on the street is that two Democrat attorneys have already jumped in to take down Republican District Court Judge Bert Richardson in 2008. They include Ron Rangel & an unknown Anglo candidate. Currently neither has filed their paperwork for office.

Judge Bert Richardson, 379th Criminal District Court Bio from Bexar County Web Site:

"State District Judge, 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.  Appointed by Honorable George W. Bush, Governor of the State of Texas, September 1, 1999, and was elected November 2000.  He obtained his undergraduate degree from BrighamYoungUniversity and his law degree from St. Mary's University School of Law in 1987.  Before being appointed to the bench he served in numerous sections (appeals, juvenile, general felony) in the Bexar County District Attorney's Office as an intern and prosecutor and is Board Certified in Criminal Law.  He was an Assistant United States Attorney from 1998 until his appointment in 1999.  Judge Richardson teaches Trial Advocacy at St. Mary's University School of Law and has taught Criminal Procedure and Legal Research and Writing at San Antonio College.  He served a two year mission for his church in Argentina and is fluent in Spanish.  An avid photographer, his photographs appear in numerous publications and websites across the country."

Why have these Democrats jumped in?  They sense weakness and they may be right.  Judge Richardson is not known to be a strong political campaigner. He is not seen much on the Republican horizon.  He is not active in local community charities unlike Judge Karen Pozza (Community Justice Project) and Lori Massey. (San Antonio Women's Chamber of Commerce)  He looked really bored and uninterested when he campaigned in 2004.  I know his mother, since I have an aunt who has bought art from his mother's art gallery when she had her downtown location a few years ago.   

NanEtte Richardson was really responsible for his campaign success in the past.  Why? She is a great marketer and her network of friends is magnificent. Will it overcome the Hillary and Ciro tornado that will hit BexarCounty in 2008?  Democrats will be out in full force in 2008.  It is for this reason that Judge Richardson will be taken down in 2008.

He should enjoy his last 11 months in office.  This guy is going down faster than former Judge Mark Luitjen.  Just you watch.  Democrats want it all!!!  The County Courts at Law are owned by us now.  We want more.  Thank God the other side is asleep at the wheel.

I'll be back next week with more goodies.

That's the moderate view, I AM the Republicrat.

Thanks for reading the new edition of South Texas Republicans.  We welcome your comments, complaints and suggestions.  Joe Solis, Founder and Director  (SolisJoe@sbcglobal.net)